In using the new operating system Nokia Belle on N8, one of the reasons became clear ... They've got it! Nokia Belle, the latest version of Symbian, looks very much like a customized version of Android.It has a horizontal home screen desktop. It has all kinds of different sizes, different materials, thrown anywhere. It has the same drop-down notification bar. It has the app tray button at the bottom, and a pop-up menu button. It is sometimes unresponsive, navigation buttons are not clear, and sometimes shock move. Heck, it could even spell "open source" attached to it (at least until April 2011)! Why want to load Android on their phones when they can make an operating system just like it without much effort?
Well, okay ... it's not exactly like Android. Nokia Belle has better battery life and an application store completely different nature only supports Symbian applications. Of course, it lacks many of the Google applications, but many Android devices (such as those from Amazon) these days lack those as well. It does not seem to have the same depth of community support program as well as the number of applications, so that. However, I think it's safe to say that Nokia has been down that road.
2. Android does not have much difference with 10-year-old Smartphone OS
User interface, you have notifications from all your programs at the top, you've got a home screen with widgets that you can sort that will display the information needed to access the easy access, and you've got a menu noitat all your applications reside. I just described Android? Or I described Microsoft Pocket PC operating system smart phone from 10 years ago? You are both right! Certainly there are many other differences and Android has received more complex by adding the widget to the notification tray and whatnot, but the basic fundamentals really have not progressed or improved in Android. It is still the home screen widget, notification bar, and launch the application.
Windows Phone, on the other hand, implementation of a completely new type of interface design not only works well on the small smart phone projector, but to scale up to larger screen (as you'll see in Windows 8 / Xbox 360) and also leave room for new methods of user interaction such as 3D gesture recognition and voice control is really not possible with conventional user interface that you see that made by Apple and Google. Plus, you've got heart content and structure of the central task. 3rd party applications to find content they might be related to the menu as opposed to a "program" and "center" of the organization, content and applications from all types of sources together in a way that makes a lot of sense, but it is quite different from the psychological "launch an application, then find your stuff".
3. There are too many "sell pizza" in the neighborhood
You do not succeed in business if you do exactly the same thing as everyone else. There are actually only a manufacturers using Android has seen continued success with it and that is Samsung. HTC, LG, Sony, etc., struggling a bit, while Samsung and Apple is at the top. Android on the phone does not automatically make you successful. It would be like opening a pizza place across the street next to the 5 where pizza and apple stores. Sure, pizza is very good, and some people think it tastes better than fruit, but if you want to stand out in the food business, you have to do something new. That's why Nokia has gone all Windows Phone. It's fresh, it's different, and it's delicious.
4. Deploying Android becomes quite expensive
I know what you're thinking ... Android is free and open source, how it can be more expensive? Well, for one, you still have to pay Microsoft licensing fees for intellectual property patents. Then you have to pay your own developers and spent a lot of time trying to make it something unique enough to be noticed. Then you have to spend a lot on lawyers when Apple event.
By focusing on the Windows Phone, Nokia actually get money from Microsoft instead of paying them to use Android. Nokia has absolutely nothing to worry about litigation software since Microsoft has been granted a patent by Apple that they can use and they have vowed to include the manufacturer Windows Phone in this regard. For the software development of Nokia, they have a lot less work to do with Windows Phone. No need to mess around with the user interface and it takes many years of learning how to master Android development. This makes more time for application development and integration with the operating system, thereby increasing the value as opposed to wasting time changing things just for the sake of difference.
5. Android will not look nice on a Nokia
When I Photoshopped image title to display a screen Android on the Nokia Lumia 920, I gagged a little. It looks extremely out of place. Style is all off. Yes, Nokia has put a number of developers to work and hire a designer to fix it, but no matter how many Android developers, a legacy problem with the open source nature of system operating as nothing will ever really consistent. Even if you customize and skin the entire operating system and all the applications you want to stick to to make it look unique and different from all the other Android devices out there ... as soon as some one install a third party application, that's going to break design cohesion and caused a little experience to fall. On the other hand, Windows Phone follows a consistent design language (codenamed Metro) maintain a cohesive look throughout the operating system, as well as third-party applications. In addition, the Windows Phone user interface design provides a more personal and easy to customize the device. In many ways it's own customized based on the stuff that you like and it just looks great on the brightly colored phone of Nokia.
6. Become a part of the ecosystem Windows 8/Xbox is a potential
Microsoft is putting a lot of effort into the competition as a complete computing ecosystem. They have been very successful with Windows on desktop and laptop computer side of things, and they are also very successful in the living room with the Xbox 360. Microsoft is not so great on the web search music stores, tablets, smart phones and things though. Apple and Google have been excellent in the field. However, Microsoft plans to compete in the field has gained steam. Bing has forced Google began to innovate with their web search results again and has made its own market share. Microsoft Surface tablet was able to create a large amount of buzz in the tech world, and Xbox Music is expected to launch with the new feature as-is unknown. Nokia can tap into other markets and has since Microsoft has done Nokia Maps to Bing, Windows 8 Maps application, and even Facebook. If Nokia has partnered with Google, you know Google will not be able to provide customers with Nokia's mapping services. Google has very little presence in the living room, too. Potential ecosystem developing new Microsoft just seems bigger.
Why is not both Windows Phone and Android?
If you read to this you be yourself ask, "Why should not Nokia build cả Android và Windows Phone?" Samsung, HTC, vv, all working conditions which the. Chac chan, the seems to be as a selection, but one of also can see is a conversation khủng Hoàng Nhân Dân or missing sự cam links. Nokia would like to build Thương hiệu of Minh Xung around Windows Phone và mang back a number of arguments thủ Edge tranh really for you. Android is one of the have been PHA leave for mode Phone di action of Nokia. Nokia do not want to cho to the and help Đỗ Kế Thủ their. Họ would like to given Chiến pain and file trung không enabled of them to do one something better against 'Android.
0 comments:
Post a Comment